Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical
Creation Narratives
By Dr Peter Bouteneff
Baker Academic (2008)
ISBN: 0801032334
Price: £10.48 (Amazon UK)
By Dr Peter Bouteneff
Baker Academic (2008)
ISBN: 0801032334
Price: £10.48 (Amazon UK)
In Beginnings, Dr Peter Bouteneff takes on the unenvied task
of putting together an analysis of the various patristic understandings of the
Biblical creation narrative, or Hexameron for short. The subject was briefly
raised by Dr Bouteneff in his book ‘sweeter than honey’ where he explains a
quite spirited discussion he had with a monastic friend on this matter, leading
him to produce this book on various takes on the narratives. The text produces
gives a well guided analysis of the allusions made the text by various writers
from the 1st to 4th Centuries, ending with the
Cappadocian Fathers.
The structure of the book makes it easily readable, and the
depth in which Bouteneff goes is a clear display of his dedication to solving
this highly polemical issue of “which is the Orthodox view of creation” often
relating to the various creationism/evolution debates in the wider Christian
community. Bouteneff does this this in a scholarly and simple manner, beginning
with the earliest Christian sources, namely St Paul, the Apostolic Fathers and
continuing on with the fathers and writers that followed. Bouteneff also takes
the opportunity to explore the anthropological impact of the text on the
writings of these fathers, allowing for the reader to see how the Patristic
approach to Genesis 1-3 influenced the Patristic understanding of man’s place
in creation.
As a reference text for exegetical study, the book does well to explore how the
fathers approached the Hexameron, referencing their works in the context in
which they were written and not passing any judgement or working with an
agenda. This provides the reader with a well surveyed analysis of the writers
of these Early Christian thinkers on a topic which can be complicated at the
least. The text is also full of key references and cross references to other
thinkers whose work influenced these points, allowing for a growth in
understand of any consensus points.
The key strength of this work is that it does not presume
that the reader has a knowledge of the fathers, allowing anyone to pick up and
read up on these points without having to be an authority on the subject. It
also does what many more expensive academic texts do, and for a fraction of the
price, giving the reader an overview and well written analysis of a complex
subject with clear reference to the text and without the risk of agenda or
bias.
A weakness of the text comes from the very topic, in that
there is little to no real conclusion to be had. Bouteneff admits this from the
start and does not try to delude the reader into expecting to find out the
‘consensus of the fathers’ on the issue of the Evolution/Creationism debate or
solving the matter of the ‘6 day creation,’ simply pointing out that there is
an acceptance of allegory on the condition that it does not take away from the
historicity of God as creator. This means that many of the old debates are
still left open, though the more moderate of readers would appreciate the
clarity given by Bouteneff in this synopsis.
Overall, Beginnings is a good outline text for someone who
wishes to understand the approach of Patristic writers on the creation
narrative, and a well written text which allows for any level of reader to
approach the subject. The book does not offer anything more to the ongoing
debate on the ‘Orthodox approach’ to the Hexameron, but aims to give a synopsis
of how the fathers read Genesis 1-3 and its impact on their Theology. It does
this in a way that makes the book both a fulfilling and worthwhile read, and is
certainly (in my view) a must read text on the matter.
Wow! This looks phenomenal! I've come across a rather unsettling number of individuals who consider the Genesis account of Adam and Eve allegorical, so I'm very curious to know what is written in this book. Thank you so much for sharing!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the response John. The Book is certainly a good study and shows the variety of responses taken by Patristic scholars.
ReplyDeleteI see no issue with a partically allegorical interpretation as the text was never meant as a Scientific account (Some such as Blessed Augustine and St Gregory of Nyssa take issue with absolute literalism), though the issue with allegory comes with the taking of away of the 'historicity' of the act of creation (not just the interpretation of details like how long a day is) and taking God out of the equation.
Allegory is a dangerous route to take on the text, though claiming it as scientific fact can also lead to some quite tragic flaws, as demonstrated by the 18th Century 'dating method' which puts the world as younger than many of its trees. The fathers had no consensus on the date of the Earth and saw it as of no consequence to faith, as the message of the text and its Theological points were more important, though again this is disputed by others. I see this as an important lesson to Christians today, who spend more time arguing this than understanding the meaning of the text in our Spiritual lives.
Overall, the variety of approaches in the fathers demonstrates how broad the understandings of the creation is, which makes it a fascinating subject and worthy of far more study than the usual 1 sided writings give it.